Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DHI Water • Environment • Health


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure)—Reason: Thanks for the mild trouting. :) I assumed that all the articles had identical merit, based on preliminary research of a few. I'll dig deeper and nominate any individually that warrant further discussion. Livitup (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

DHI Water • Environment • Health

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A single author, Qiy (talk) (contribs), has created pages for this company and several software products created by this company. The user has repeatedly deleted CSD tags from the articles (see user talk page for examples). Neither the company nor any of its software seems to be noteworthy. The top 100 Ghits are all press releases, announcements that the company is working on some project, or publications of OR. I'll be listing the articles of the software products as part of this AfD, so everyone can get the whole context. This is the first time I've AfD'ed on such a grand scale, so if this is improper or stupid please trout me and I'll go away. Livitup (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

The following additional articles should be included in this AfD. These are all articles on software products produced by DHI. The same user created these all these articles, including the one on DHI. Livitup (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)




 * Keep - I started at least one of those articles (FEFLOW) since it is software used for simulating groundwater flow. The company is one of the oldest water simulation software companies in the world (1973), and they are internationally known. It would be silly to delete all of these (in particular: the company page, FEFLOW, MIKE SHE and MIKE 11. I can't comment on the others, since I don't know much about them. I imagine a few can be merged). However, I did express my comments on the article name for the company here, and the articles probably need a bit of copy editing. + m t  18:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relist individually. Some (FEFLOW) have many Google news/scholar/books hits, others (Temporal Analyst) have practically none. (Best if you just relist the ones with few G-hits, obviously.) Phlegm Rooster (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.