Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DIDWW Ireland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

DIDWW Ireland

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable company. The sources in the article, and those found in my own WP:BEFORE, do not support a claim to notability under WP:SIGCOV or WP:NORG. Frankly, from what I can tell, there aren't even sufficiently reliable sources to support the text in the article. And the level of FV issues and apparent REFBOMBing is more than a little problematic. As raised by, and  in the previous AfD discussion, the majority of the references available (in the article and elsewhere) are press releases, directory-style listings, ROTM industry publications and other trivial passing mentions that do not support a claim to notability. (In almost every case, they don't even support the text they are placed alongside.) That multiple versions of this article continue to be created in Draft form(s) is also confusing and disquieting... Guliolopez (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note that the separate Draft:DIDWW Ireland Limited was created shortly after the previous article was deleted and prior AfD was closed. It was AfC declined before yet another draft (Draft:DIDWW Ireland Ltd.) was created and promptly moved to the main article namespace. Draft:DIDWW Ireland was previously deleted as an abandoned draft. There's a lot going on here. And it's difficult to follow. But it seems that this content keeps being recreated. Without any of the issues raised (by multiple contributors) being addressed. Likely need a definitive AfD outcome/consensus once and for all....) Guliolopez (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Traumnovelle (talk) 21:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - I agree with the need for a definitive AfD decision. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - not a notable company. Spleodrach (talk) 11:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.