Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DIY-Dragon

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 10:32, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

DIY-Dragon
Webcomic that only started two and a half weeks ago. Far too new to qualify listing by anyone's standards. Possible vanity and self-promotion by the looks of it. --Paul Soth 21:36, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Agree, delete. A webcomic would be notable if it was running regularly for over a year. Radiant! 22:13, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The page creator seems to have significant Wikipresence (although with anon IPs, it's hard to say for sure), so I don't think it's a vanity page; but web comic which has only been running for a couple of weeks is definitely jumping the gun in getting an article. If it were a new project by a notable creator (say, Jeff Rowland's new Magical Adventures in Space comic, for instance), then, perhaps; but this pretty clearly isn't. As they say in Chicago, Wait 'Till Next Year. --Ray Radlein 23:15, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too new. Does not meet Web comics criteria for inclusion.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 01:29, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 07:28, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)