Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ I-Dee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

DJ I-Dee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:NMG and also has few or no independent references as required by WP:V. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced and does not assert notability. If, by some miracle, the article was to be kept, it would require a substantial re-write, as the language used is not encyclopedic ("This sparked ears to open as he was slowly beginning to become a force to be reckoned within the competition circuit." - I have no idea what this sentence means!) --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 11:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I dislike one editor articles, even more so when the article is only being edited by the subject for vain purposes. Also re-establishing afd tag that was removed. treelo  talk 19:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article exists for promotional purposes. Not encyclopedic; references consist mostly of junk from Myspace and something called trooperz.com, which is not independent or reliable.  Enigma  message 19:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If it weren't already obvious from the username, check out some of the self-promotional junk I removed, which makes it clear that the article was written as self-promotion. I'll remove some more of it, and that will leave very little real material to work with.  Enigma  message 19:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I have removed all information that appears as self-promotion (Trooperz or MySpace) and have kept only information referenced from an independent source.Djidee (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Appears to have some notability based on recently added references ukexpat (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't know how reliable the Miami New Times is, but I know the same source didn't need to be referenced five separate times! I've consolidated it into one named reference.  I'm still unconvinced about his notability. --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 20:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The Miami New Times wikipedia page shows that it is owned by Village Voice Media which has been longly established, independent and notable. Thanks for consolidating it into one reference, I'm still new to this. -- djidee User ¦Djidee (talk) 20:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have continued to update DJ I-Dee with more notable references to the "Championship Titles" section. Djidee (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Championship Titles have been removed due to the majority of the community disagreeing with the cited references as well as the removal of the Infobox for musicial artists.Djidee (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The MNT story and competition performances indicate a musician on his way up in the business, but not quite notable under Wikipedia definitions. No prejudice to creating an article when and if his album charts. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable performer who has as yet to release an album. Fails WP:MUSIC.   Corvus cornix  talk  23:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: If this page and Solitude are deleted, as seems likely, the following images should probably be deleted under CSD:G6 as they are not used anywhere else:
 * Image:DJIDEE solitude.jpg‎
 * Image:DJ wiki.jpg‎
 * Image:Eclectic dreams Screenshot23.jpg‎
 * Image:Idee logo wiki.gif‎
 * Image:Eclectic dreams Screenshot.jpg‎
 * Image:Th ideelogoanimebw.gif‎
 * Image:I-dee.jpg‎
 * Most of them are probably copyvios anyway. Stifle (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Since you're an admin, could you take care of this? Some of them aren't being used on the articles now anyway.  Enigma  message 08:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.