Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ LRM & Kanye West: Ego


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The nomination for Lushlife Presents: West Sounds was withdrawn by nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

DJ LRM &amp; Kanye West: Ego

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is the subject of a non-notable and trivial mixtape by Kanye West. Mixtapes rarely, if ever, receive reviews or sales. It fails WP:N, there is no "Significant coverage" of the topic. All the article can ever be is a tracklisting and an infobox  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   09:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons as above:


 * Delete all - Underground mixtapes are general not notable; nothing special in these casesl. /Blaxthos 14:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:MUSIC. -- B figura (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No multiple, non-trivial coverage, just a track listing. Unlike an album, this can never expand to have info such as background, themes, sales, certifications, or a wide range of reviews from music critics. There are song articles much longer than these. Spellcast 18:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep West Sounds Was the subject of extensive media coverage due to it combining what is considered one of the best pop albums of all time with West's music. It is famous along the lines of The Grey Album. It could definitely use some expansion but it is a very notable album. --Djsasso 19:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: So you want to keep Lushlife Presents: West Sounds (Kanye Meets The Beach Boys) but delete all of the others? --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   16:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yeah I can accept the others going. But this one was a landmark album. --Djsasso 20:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have retracted the AfD for that one now. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   20:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If it is indeed a landmark album, it'd be a good idea to provide multiple, reliable sources (other than a track listing). Otherwise, it will probably be taken to AfD again. Spellcast 21:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems correct and good article about a album ..to me at least.--Zingostar 20:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: But it's not an album, it's a mixtape which has no information reviews etc. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   20:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.