Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Mad Linx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Can't really say there's "consensus" for anything - but nobody voted to keep this either. -- Y not? 13:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

DJ Mad Linx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article does not meet WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 19:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 10.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  19:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (tell me stuff)  @ 21:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (articulate)  @ 21:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  03:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)




 * Weak delete - Having done a search, I couldn't find much. There are passing mentions in articles like this and more substantive stuff like this though it seems there's a commercial sponsorship-style arrangement there so the independence is questionable. There's also this one and the one linked to in the article but I'm not sure whether those are considered reliable sources. That's about all I could find. If the last two "hip hip" sources are reliable, then he probably passes WP:GNG. Stalwart 111  06:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.