Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Rossstar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

DJ Rossstar
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No real claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Gsearch and gnews not turning up reliable, independent sources that show notability. (Note: not really close enough to original version for a G4 speedy.) Prod contested by IP user without comment. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete Does not really seem to be notable, as per nomination. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability per WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO, so there's no reason to have an article on this person. The article as written by the article creator appears to be of a clearly promotional nature.  Lastly, this article was created by the same user less than a day after I refused to do it per Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Submissions/DJ_Rossstar, explaining that it had the same problems as the last time it was deleted and needed improvement.  (Though, I'm not sure why a registered user used that process in the first place, except they may not have known any better.)  The created version was effectively the same as the version I had told the user would not fair well.  While in and of itself not a reason for deletion, the fact the user created the page anyway, adding a bolded part at the top about the time the show was on, does seem to provide evidence that this page was created with promotional intent. &hArr; &int;Æ S   dt  @ 06:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as subject as yet another webcaster with no third-party sources to prove notabilty or even complete verifiability does not cross the notability threshold. I did put the article in a couple of proper categories and did some cleanup, including removing the bolded line about his broadcast schedule per WP:NOTDIR. - Dravecky (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.