Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Roxxi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes.

(Despite being "involved" - The nom's withdrawn so obviously the outcome's gonna be the same.) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010  •  (talk)  13:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

DJ Roxxi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG and reads like an advert with questionable factual accuracy (I cannot believe the phrase "the only Indian female club DJ in South Africa", for example). Laun chba  ller  17:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please note that the consensus of the last AfD was to keep but improve, and I can see no evidence of improvement. WP:TNT applies.-- Laun  chba  ller  17:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The result of the first AfD which was only 6 months ago was 'Keep', not 'Keep but improve'. The sources identified in that discussion clearly show that WP:GNG is satisfied. --Michig (talk) 18:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per User:Acb314's comments in the previous AfD. The article may need cleanup, but sources exist and do appear to establish notability for the subject per WP:GNG. - Aoidh (talk) 21:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig - Why no one's bothered adding the sources from the previous AFD is beyond me but perhaps the nom or someone here should transfer them over otherwise this is going to be a merry-go-round!. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep (for now) - Unless somebody actually puts the references in there, this fails WP:BLP. If nobody cares enough to do that, perhaps it should be Delete next time this comes up, and it'll probably come up again if it stays this time.  It's been six months already, and it's not fixed.  XeroxKleenex (talk) 01:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Another solution is to treat this as a WP:BLPPROD; i.e. if no-one can be bothered to add the references, it should be deleted until someone can because as written this is a WP:BLP violation. References on an AfD mean absolutely nothing to me because - and I am not the first person to say this - they are just links on some random talk page.-- Laun  chba  ller  13:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Now that the references are present I'm going to withdraw this. I know notability is independent of the article but waiting until the references are there saves a third AfD.-- Laun  chba  ller  12:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.