Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Seezy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

DJ Seezy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is one year old, and has no sourced content. The article contains one outside link - which is one of those do-it-yourself webdesign sites, therefore lacks any credibility, nor does the site contain any information of value. Even the content of the article shows no reason to keep, as it is simply a list of people that this DJ has worked with - all unsourced. Kellymoat (talk) 03:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Additional nominator Comment - page was previously nominated for AfD one year ago. The nomination was closed because a sockpuppet was the nominator. The only contribution to the AfD stated that the only mentions of this guy is on social media, which is still the case today. Also worth noting, the article appears to be written by one user, and that user's only contributions have been to this article or to add this name to other articles. Kellymoat (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing to back up these claims of notability. Google News turns up nothing for this person under their given and DJ names.  caknuck °  needs to be running more often  04:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete - I don't know what the problem is? I really don't know why you/they wanna delete the site of my client DJ Seezy? He is a (underrated) Producer from Germany and really worked with this artits via sending them beats and these listed artitst picked the beats for there tapes! We all know that the new producers in the hip hop community don't get the recognition they deserve especially producer from overseas who placed beats on notable tapes for well known artits. He is right now on that point to level up his career and this site helps him. 00:26 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for adding more evidence as to why this should be deleted.


 * 1) First, you have a COI. Big no-no.
 * 2) This is an encyclopedia. We report on events of the past. Not the future. This site isn't here for free advertising. Kellymoat (talk) 00:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Can you read? The list of the production discography are events from the past! What I mean is he is on the point to get more recognition for his work now and this has nothing to do with wikipedia but people here can read what he done so far! What is wrong with that?


 * What's wrong with that? Spend $50 on your own web-domain. WP isn't your own personal ad agency.  Kellymoat (talk) 10:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I never said that this is my own personal ad agency. As I see you have been hard dogged to delete this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaza716 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * My neighbor has a Grammy and doesn't have an article. My late-ex is in the Hall of Fame of both of the organizations in that industry and only has a stub-article. The article doesn't even have the right birth name, and I can't correct/edit it because I have a COI. Me, myself, I recently found my name on the unclaimed royalties section of AFM & SAGAFTRA. I received a six-figure check, all because I moved a couple times, some checks were sent to the old addresses and never cashed. I do not have an article.
 * Do you think that your "client" is at that level? His career, as of today (not what could be in the future), is considered encyclopedic, while the 3 mentioned above are not? This is an encyclopedia. It is not a celebrity fansite. But, again, you have a COI, you should not be the one creating, editing, or debating the article. Kellymoat (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nominator. No significant indication of notability, references are profile pages. Hayman30 (talk) 13:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. There is a lack of notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom, no real notability and lack of sources to support the claims in the article. Shellwood (talk) 19:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - I was wondering if an admin can close this Afd. The article creator, primary content provider, and admitted "agent" of the subject has taken it upon himself to delete all content (except the Afd template) from the article. It is now a blank page with an AfD box. Kellymoat (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.