Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DL Viewer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 11:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

DL Viewer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found nothing that would make this software pass WP:N. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

lukart66: (talk) 18.45, 29 December 2011 Almost everyone using a MS-Dos computer in the 90ies knew this small computer program, just as now we all know vlc... In most of the BBS (bulletin boards) you could find a DL animation file area dedicated the animations you could view with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukart66 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment:The comment above is the article creator. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - Non-notable piece of software. Kuguar03 (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No claim of notability. The only result that Google seemed to return is this article.  External links appear to consist of the author's own home page, a Facebook group set up by the author (with comments by 2 (two) other people over the 3 years it has existed) and a site with  a long list of file extensions.  The last suggests an image file format ".dl" exists but gives no more details. Other "file extension" sites return nothing.  This article appears to also have been written by the author. My conclusion is that the only source is the author. Whilst it might have existed it certainly doesnt appear notable. Pit-yacker (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 01:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.