Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DMarket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

DMarket

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete References fails the criteria for establishing notability and are either based on company announcements (fails as a PRIMARY source and/or WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:ORGIND) or are mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or are based on quotations/interviews with no independent analysis or opinions (fails PRIMARY and WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:ORGIND). Probably WP:TOOSOON. -- HighKing ++ 18:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Keep Subject is highly notable and famous within the gaming industry, raised millions of dollars in hours. May not be notable as a political article but within the gaming industry, it is a revolutionary step. Easily passes WP:GNG, the person who is in the gaming may determine the notability, thanks! Vibrant.Wiki (talk) 08:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Salavat (talk) 08:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , please familiarize yourself with deletion discussions. If you believe it is highly notable, it is up to you to prove that it is. It could've raised billions and billions, and it might be the most popular thing in the world, but without sources, there's no valid reason to have an article on the subject. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. A quick search on the custom WP:VG/RS Google search engine brings up very little. It is mentioned once, in a piece by The New York Times, but that's the best I could find. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I could not find any reliable sources to prove notability. ZettaComposer (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that suggests the group passes corporate notability standards.   Dr Strauss   talk   11:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.