Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNTST


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

DNTST

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG of the 17 sources 12 are soundcloud or itunes so are not useful for showing notability. 1 is the label so not independent, 3 (2 are identical sources, Earmilk) is a passing mention, as is dancingastronaute, 1; weraveyou is a site that accepts payment for promotional articles here so not reliable. the number of views on soundcloud is not an indicator of notability as a simple search on google for "pay for views on soundcloud" will suggest. Domdeparis (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 14:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 14:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 14:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Nomination covers it pretty well, and my additional searches turned up nothing beyond download sites. Despite releasing on independent labels, I can't find any independent third party indication of these releases other than run of the mill promotional. ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy Fair points. My main thoughts of notability were in reference to the play count (largely soundcloud (about 21 million plays total), which gained a majority of its plays via 8tracks.com, a playlist website), spotify (about 1.5 million plays), and youtube (a few hundred thousand)). In hindsight, I should have refrained from making the article. If the article pops up in the future, I'll let it handle itself organically. I apologize for getting excited and starting this without proper reason. Happy new year! Sincerely, DNTST (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy incase he becomes notable Atlantic306 (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.