Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOMO Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (WP:Non-admin closure) Bruddersohn (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

DOMO Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company without sources since tagged with notability in december 2007 Bjelleklang -  talk 13:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. I suspect the article does not do the company justice but any organisation with a turnover of nearly 1 billion Euros must be notable. Malcolma (talk) 15:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  02:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep As this is a private company it is not listed in any stock exchanges, but it does seem to be borderline notable. Not sure if revenue in an of itself is sufficient basis for inclusion. WP:CORP has nothing on that. I see some basic third-party mentions and even Business Week has a blurb about it. § FreeRangeFrog  00:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: As far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong), Bloomberg is just a list of companies. It doesn't say anything for notability other than the fact that the company exists, similar to Proff.no(translated version). Bjelleklang -  talk 07:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep they're notable. --Shorthate (talk) 23:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.