Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOS Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

DOS Records
no google hits, non-existent, possible hoax and even if there was a real label by that name, then not notable. So I'd say Speedy Delete as possible hoax --Arnzy (Talk) 07:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - article itself claims that it is a "DYI net label", which pretty much screams "delete me, I'm not notable". Wickethewok 08:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - What does a "net record label" do anyway? They don't promote their artists, they don't manufacture CDs... are they anything but a name? Zetawoof(&zeta;) 18:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Net Labels are non RIAA, and provide under the common creative license. Pepsicola06 08:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Umm... ok. Wickethewok 08:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - that's most admirable... how does that make this notable? Lankiveil 13:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 10:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Lankiveil 13:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete Prome  theus  -X303-  13:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn company, probaly hoax, advertising? --Ter e nce Ong 14:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn ad Funky Monkey 01:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, article asserts nonnotability. Haikupoet 03:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.