Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOSarrest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

DOSarrest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no valid sources for notability. 3, 4, & 7 are just mentioned. 8 is not the London Stock Exchange, but a press release service they run -- AS search of the LSE site shows they are not listed there. Nothing else here is even remotely reliable  DGG ( talk ) 21:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:09, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:09, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now (draft/userfy if wished) as my searches found no good coverage aside from this (and one result in Books), here and here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG, searches for any substantive information just come up with more press releases. — Brianhe (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.