Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOUG (atheism)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

DOUG (atheism)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - The article itself says it all, and I quote: "The word is normally passed via oral tradition amongst small atheist communities, and has yet to appear in popular media." In order for an article to be included on Wikipedia, it must meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability, a very specific point being that an article must be noteworthy enough to be mentioned in reliable, legitimate third-party publication. It also must be verifiable per these sources. Scapler (talk) 07:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Delete Not notable enough yet.Alberon (talk) 08:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense. Has anyone done a Google search for "Dogma Of Unrelenting Goodness"? Zero non-WP hits. It's a silly invention like this editor's only other article. andy (talk) 10:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:NFT. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense, WP:NFT. No sources, no Google hits. -- Explodicle (T/C) 14:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - No references, no links inside or outside Wikipedia, 2 Google hits with both linking to Wikipedia. As far as I can tell, complete nonsense. gm_matthew (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as it would be far too embarrassing if it caught on. Doug Weller (talk) 18:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.