Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOVO Solingen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

DOVO Solingen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Company fails WP:NCORP and WP:NCOMPANY. Refs are routine news, product launches, growth reports, in violation of WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ROUTINE - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 02:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

*Delete per nom The Trash Compactor (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The Trash Compactor has now been indef blocked as Wikipedia:NOTHERE. — Maile (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. We need more participants in order to close this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: These are the only articles that I can find on google when I search DOVO Solingen. Although WP:GOOGLEHITS is generally no guarantee that the subject is not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, I have seen no indication that it meets requirements. Additionally, of the 6 sources shown on the Wiki page, 4 of them are sourced directly from the DOVO website, 1 is apparently from a book I can't view, and another is from thelocalde. Please do correct me if you see otherwise but I see no proof of enduring or present notability. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Yes there are Google hits, but no sources with SIGCOV denoting any notability. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.