Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DRK-Quark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete as G3 by INeverCry (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

DRK-Quark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any sources supporting the existence of this concept. Google doesn't find "DRK" in the book mentioned under Further reading. &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO  15:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp; H HHIPPO   15:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as a hoax. The general form of the Schrodinger equation has no bearing on supersymmetry. The book ref is on nuclear physics, not particle physics or supersymmetry. There is no such thing as G-theory and the link points to a disambig page of unrelated concepts. Supersymmetric annihilation doesn't work that way. In short, patent nonsense. --Mark viking (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2013 (UTC).
 * Speedily delete as hoax, and permablock the originator. Binksternet (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment It looks like this article has just been speedy deleted via G3 by INeverCry. Does this mean we can close this AFD? --Mark viking (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.