Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DRNH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔   12:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

DRNH

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established within the article. Provided references do not assert notability. Purported awards are not shown to be sufficient to meet GNG. C679 12:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve; their reconstruction of the Reduta Theatre won awards such as Building of the Year (2006) or Grand Prix of the Society of Czech Architects - National Architecture Award (2006) (Czech Radio), Archiweb,  (Lidové noviny) etc. DRNH designed other important projects in Brno, such as Moravian Gallery  (Deník). The references are in Czech but they are reliable and independent. I'll try to improve the article - it is a very interesting topic. I know their work closely and I consider it excellent :) --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   07:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keepat present the notability has to be induced from the major buildings undertaken, by the limited amount of prizes,and the very limited amount of  critical work about them   Even a single serious monpgraphic length discussion of their work as a while would be very helpful, there;s enough already here to show notability.  DGG ( talk ) 09:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.