Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DTU Fotonik, Department of Photonics Engineering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Technical University of Denmark. Overall consensus is to redirect so redirect it shall be (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 04:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

DTU Fotonik, Department of Photonics Engineering

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability (WP:GNG). Individual university departments are typically not notable independently from their faculty or university.  Sandstein  07:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Technical University of Denmark —Мандичка YO 😜 07:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notability established by and . Nom may wish to open a discussion on Talk:Technical University of Denmark about how best to cover content in  and . ~Kvng (talk) 17:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * These are passing mentions. The articles are about the science, not the institute.  Sandstein   17:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Articles done have to be about the subject to constitute WP:SIGCOV. I admit the first is not a great example. The second is solid. For good measure, here's another: . ~Kvng (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Another passing mention, again about the technology and not the institute.  Sandstein   08:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  08:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Technical University of Denmark as per Sandstein. Solntsa90 (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.