Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DTV Innovations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 07:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

DTV Innovations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very PROMO, does not meet WP:NCORP with no significant in-depth independent coverage. Last four edits made by a blocked sock farm. Deprodded in 2019. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 01:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 01:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 01:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 01:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete The article content is largely unreferenced, and the few references used are either press releases or primary sources. I was not able to find any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cullen328 (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete; can't find anything indicating its significance. &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete because it has a lot of weasel terms. I.hate.spam.mail.here (This is YOUR page) (talk) 05:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Delete per User:Cullen. SoyokoAnis  -  talk  13:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability or SIGCOV by reliable sources, mentions that I can find are surface-level. Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Snow delete there's zero indication that this is notable and the chance that it will be kept is pretty much non-existing at this point. So it might as well be snow deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.