Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DVD Verdict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 10:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

DVD Verdict

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:WEB - there is only a single non-self-published source for the article, an archived excerpt of an interview with one of the site's writers from 2002. Kelly hi! 15:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — Kelly  hi! 15:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  — Kelly  hi! 15:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong keep DVD Verdict is one of the top DVD review websites much like DVD Talk. Major movie studios work with DVD Verdict to get press coverage and reviews of their new releases.  DVD Verdict is also counted as a reliable source for countless Wikipedia film related articles.  They are more than notable.12.196.37.227 (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. They're on Itunes itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/dvd-verdict-presents/id180270268. SCTV includes their reviews of them on their website [], IMDB lists them with Roger Ebert, Salon.Com, etc as reviewers [], and Rottentomatoes.com considers them a source []. Markvs88 (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep 8 sources should be sufficient to keep it; the minimum number required is 2. Linda Olive (talk) 00:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.