Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWOK-FM (Olongapo City)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Subic Broadcasting Corporation. Consensus is sourcing is of insufficient depth Star   Mississippi  04:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

DWOK-FM (Olongapo City)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can't find any reliable sources that could support the subject's notability. Israel's Son 11:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. Israel's Son 11:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources. MarioGom (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: All the sources in the article are reliable. The first two sources state the station's programming. Source 3 has a segment where it talks about the station. The last source indicated that it is nominated by the KBP as the best provincial FM station. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG 😎🙃 13:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Subic Broadcasting Corporation; fails WP:GNG. I've reviewed all four of the references in the current version of the article: #1 is written by a host from the radio station, so it's a primary source, #2 is a story about a death in the mayor's family with a quote that name-drops this station as hosting a fundraiser telethon with absolutely no additional details or context about the station or their fundraiser, #3 is a WP:BLOG, #4 is about an award won by an entirely different station that mentions this station once in passing as a finalist for the award it didn't win. Left guide (talk) 10:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument. Sources mentioned are reliable enough, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 23:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: For some reason, I don't agree with Superastig and SBKSPP on why they think the article should be kept, especially that the sources cited are merely trivial mentions of the subject, one of which was written by someone who has worked for the station. Israel's Son 02:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not my choice on whether you agree or disagree with the views of me and Astig. We have out own reason on why we believe the article meets WP:GNG. Since we can't change your mind, you can never change our minds as well. SBKSPP (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Subic Broadcasting Corporation: none of the four current sources provides independent SIGCOV. A blog is not RS, and a brief mention is not significant coverage. A claim such as "the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG" shows poor understanding of what our notability guidelines are about. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.