Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWWQ (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to GMA Network. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

DWWQ
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not cite any reliable sources. Only links to the Facebook page and live streaming are given. There is no explanation of the notability of this radio station, so it fails WP:BCAST. I can't find any reliable sources on my own. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Sourcing improvements are sorely needed here, but the base notability that a radio station has to establish to qualify for a Wikipedia article is the fact of being duly licensed by its appropriate regulatory authority — as long as it actually exists as a real radio station, and isn't a hoax or some random person's home Icecast webstream, it's entitled to some kind of coverage in Wikipedia (the only legitimate question being whether it should have a standalone article or be a redirect to a larger related topic, such as a list of radio stations in its area or an article about its programming source.) So this could stand alone as an article with the refimprove tag added, or it could be redirected to GMA Network — but absent evidence that it actually doesn't even exist, it can't just be deleted outright. Redirect to GMA Network, without prejudice against recreation in the future if the sourcing improves. Bearcat (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not pass notability guidelines Op47 (talk) 20:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.