Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXDD-FM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It has not been compellingly demonstrated that GNG or NRADIO (NBROADCAST) is met, (original programming?  Affiliate of notable network perhaps?) but I see no consensus to delete, either. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

DXDD-FM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another non-notable Philippines radio station stub. This was accepted by from AFC but I'm afraid I see no indication that this passes WP:GNG or WP:BROADCAST. The two sources provided are both primary sources that simply list the station in a directory, but confer no notability whatsoever. I see no obvious candidate for a redirect. Hugsyrup 09:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup 09:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup 09:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Catholic Media Network Nothing exceptional about this station; all easily covered in the CNM table.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is nothing notable about it, there are two references, one paragraph, and the owner of DXDD-FM doesn't even have an article. Analog Horror, (Communicate) 14:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: The 2 links in the article states that the station exists. Therefore, since the station is license by the NTC, the article is good enough to pass WP:BROADCAST. SUPER ASTIG 02:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * BTW, don't bother responding because arguing with me over my vote won't change anything at all. I'm not looking for an argument or debate here. So, I won't reply any further. I stand by my vote no matter what. SUPER ASTIG 02:20, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Well thanks for your positive attitude towards the AfD process. I won’t argue with you, but I will state for the benefit of anyone else reading your !vote that mere existence is not the required standard of WP:BROADCAST, and certainly not the required standard of the GNGs. Hugsyrup 07:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep based on a very broad interpretation of radio notability, including its operator also having an FM station. With only 456,976 possible call letters, we don't need to prevent pollution of mainspace.  I agree with User:Superastig that most arguing at AFDs is useless.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 20:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per reasons stated by Superastig and Robert McClenon. SBKSPP (talk) 07:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.