Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXDT Racing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

DXDT Racing

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Motor racing team doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG- coverage is either WP:ROUTINE or does not discuss the team in depth. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. Thanks to recent improvements in the article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment/Neutral Delete - A 5-minute Googling got me this article from RACER that I believe is significant enough to contribute to GNG, however everything else is either a press release or strictly ROUTINE in it's coverage. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but I'm not ready to !vote for deletion at this time. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"  23:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I am trying to understand how is this even remotely close to a WP:GNG worthy source. A passing mention of DXDT + quote farm + quote farm + 2 sentences about Crowdstrike (unrelated to the AfD) + another quote farm + 1 sentence about DXDT + quote farm + quote farm + a sentence about Ryan Dalziel + quote farm. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I guess your standards are higher than mine? Or more likely, mine are lower for non-BLP subjects. Although thin, there is enough secondary context about the subject to contribute to a short stub article should another worthy source be brought up. As it stands, nothing else appears to exist at this time hence why I'm likely not !voting to keep this. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"  17:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * With nothing else available, I have edited my !vote from neutral -> delete. It is indeed WP:TOOSOON for an article at this time. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"  19:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I was unable to find anything resembling significant coverage and I agree with the nom that the above doesn't constitute significant coverage. A7V2 (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacking coverage and it is an orphan article.Gusfriend (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you all for your constructive criticism and discussion of this page. Because this particular form of racing does not receive large amounts of exposure sometimes the only media covering this particular series are the ones I have already cited, as I know I cannot link to DXDT or Crowdstrike's own press releases. That is why Wikipedia has been incredibly helpful in increasing the footprint for this area of the sport and linking all the coverage in one place. With your helpful feedback, I have begun to add from additional sources including Honda, Mercedes Benz, Speedsport News, and Speedway Digest, as well as linking to other Wikipedia pages that include the team this page is about. I will continue to gather additional sources to meet your guidelines. Thanks again! Racerchick18 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

I am also in the process of linking DXDT Racing to all of the articles they were previously mentioned in. There were many, so it is taking some time while I continue to update the page. Thank you for your patience! Racerchick18 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: The article has undergone a significant expansion since the last delete !vote, which requires reanalysis of the page. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify - I have struck my delete !vote in light of the expansion of the article; although WP:NMOTORSPORT does not cover race teams at present, the team's results in GT World Challenge Americas indicates a good future WP:POTENTIAL for passing GNG. At the moment, it does not, with still only RACER providing anything more than WP:ROUTINE coverage that isn't an official release (with even RACER being debatable, as seen above). Draftifying in my opinion is the correct solution here, allowing the creator to continue working on the article until a second piece of SIGCOV is found. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"  19:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Comment  With the improvements in the page I have changed from delete to  neutral  and hope that the improvements continue. Gusfriend (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep (previously delete then neutral) - As the page has continued to improve I believe that it has reached the point that it satisfies the requirements to being kept.Gusfriend (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I have struck my delete above. Looking through the sourcing in the article as of now there still isn't much in the way of SIGNIFICANT coverage that is actually about the team (rather than the drivers, sponsors, etc), so I am not switiching to keep, just withdrawing my !vote (let's call it neutral). A7V2 (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Striking my !vote to send to draft in light of the nominator's withdrawal. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"  09:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.