Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXRacer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

DXRacer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spammy article entirely based on press releases and blogs, no evidence of substantive independent coverage. Guy (Help!) 14:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not seeing third-party significant coverage. Neutralitytalk 16:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as still nothing coming close at all for actually establishing both a convincing and substantial article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:43, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no indications of notability. I cannot locate RS coverage beyond PR and trivial mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.