Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D Company, 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion (United States). (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

D Company, 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A7 Article does not meet notability guidelines. WP:MILMOS indicates integral components of units rarely independently meet notability guidelines. Usually if notability is established, it will be included in an article on the parent unit unless the reason for notability is independent of that unit. This is particularly true when the parent, as in this case, is a support unit, not a combat unit. Lineagegeek (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 14.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per the guidance at WP:MILMOS/N. Individual companies of battalions (as opposed to some separate combat companies) have been judged NN over and over at deletion discussions. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge back into battalion article. Subordinate subunits are almost always not notable, especially in this case. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 00:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge per Peacemaker67. Anotherclown (talk) 04:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge. Company-size units, especially those which are organic to a larger unit, are not generally considered notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge Organic company-sized units are not generally considered notable. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.