Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da'unda'dogg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Da'unda'dogg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a non-notable rapper. The sources in the article are two blogs and a deadlink to a Department of Justice site that based on the title and the information it's used to cite, looks to be a primary source document related to a past arrest by the subject. External links are myspace and discogs, useless as sources. is about the death of the subject's son, and only really mentions Da'unda'dogg in a handful of sources. fails WP:SCHOLARSHIP as an undergraduate paper, and only mentions Da'unda'dogg once. Everything else I'm finding looks thoroughly unrelaible. Hog Farm Bacon 19:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. per nom.-- Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk 23:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete difficult to see how subject is notable. Awbfiend (talk) 02:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the other comment above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.