Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaBase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

DaBase

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article consists of one sentence and a page-long computer code sample in preformatted text. No reliable sources could be found, and subject seems unnotable, and no more than a library (computing) that was created by a user and uploaded to Google Code. Many other computer-related topics with the same title were found through web searching, but it could not be established as to whether they were related to this. – Dream out loud (talk) 01:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Keristrasza (talk) 10:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * DeLete - no assertion of notability. Totnesmartin (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Article doesn't state, why it is notable. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  19:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable topic, probaly promotional in intent. Rilak (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delte per nom Infinitely Humble (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I felt like saying 'Gordon Bennett!!' but thought that might be offensive, Peridon (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:Wikpedia is not for things made up one day --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.