Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Attitude Media Pvt Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 11:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Da Attitude Media Pvt Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a company, lacking reliable, independent references. No references could be found in Google News or books. Seems to fail WP:ORG. - MrX 14:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - no assertion of notability per WP:CORP, and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Part of a promotional WP:Walled garden created by editors with an evident WP:Conflict of interest, though that alone isn't grounds for deletion. Altered Walter (talk) 14:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. article seems like an advertisement.--GDibyendu (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence found that this company is notable. I have flagged the one specific claim in the article which could form some basis for a claim of notability, though it would need evidence of specific international film festival awards. AllyD (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:CORP. The company exists, just as does its founder (article on him deleted 3 years ago), but as a company it has received no coverage in independent reliable sources.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per aboveJethwarp (talk) 07:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.