Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Drought 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per WP:CSD (recreation of deleted material) and Articles for deletion/Da Drought 3, by User:Pegasus. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Da Drought 2

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:Music: "Mixtapes are are in general not notable; [unless] they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources". No indication of significant coverage here. Ros0709 (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Previously deleted; see Articles for deletion/Da Drought 3. This re-nomination is probably moot. Ros0709 (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

--Ummel (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Lmao, so if you have the record company production money behind your album, THEN you get on wikipedia? That's some racist shit. Good job, nerds.