Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da nije ljubavi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:28, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Da nije ljubavi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable compilation. Notability not asserted, could not find independent coverage beyond routine news items. GregorB (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

 Nezavisne novine BH Blic Serbia Svet Serbia Jutarnji List Croatia All of this newspapers are big in their countries. By this four only I can not see this compilation as not notable and I bet if I had more time I could probable find more papers who covered this album. So strong Keep from me.Stepojevac (talk) 15:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - This compilation album isn't independently notable. --Slashme (talk) 08:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - This compilation is clearly notable in several newspapers from different countries. In only couple of minutes I was able to find this:
 * Of these four articles, only the third (incidentally, the shortest one) is ostensibly about the album. The first is about a concert, the second about a DVD, and the fourth one about a tour. I don't think that qualifies as "coverage beyond routine news items", as stated in the nom. GregorB (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG, the coverage is routine and the article has very little expansion potential anyway.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 21:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.