Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da si ti ja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Magazin. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Da si ti ja

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

barely makes it as WP:STUB, lacks notability as an album having it's own article WP:NALBUMS Alan  -  talk  00:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - the article needs to be expanded badly. Otherwise, a search reveals a fair number of possible sources but most appear to be non-English. Not sure if that should count against the album itself, but there is reason to question notability for English Wikipedia. A redlink in the band's discography is likely to be sufficient unless anyone can come up with more notable information for this album. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 09:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:NALBUMS as an officially released album by a notable artist. A lack of English sources in no way invalidates notability for English Wikipedia if there are adequate non-English sources. Rlendog (talk) 01:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge with the band's main article or discography. 1) The help pages about referencing state that sources do not need to be in English. 2) There is too little information for a separate article. 3) If the band is notable, their work needs to be covered. Merging offers the best of both world; no stubs, but complete coverage. - Mgm|(talk) 10:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  —GregorB (talk) 01:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.