Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadvan Yousuf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  02:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Dadvan Yousuf

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article with a very problematic history. Its creator, Kcosip, has been blocked for sockpuppetry (Sockpuppet investigations/Kcosip/Archive), but also previously showed COI, PROMO, and so on. It has been thoroughly edited by new single-purpose accounts. Talk:Dadvan Yousuf is full of IPs, blocked accounts. Likewise, this article appears to be a piece of PROMO. As another editor noted on its talkpage, the notability is very questionable per WP:NBIO and WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. Aintabli (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Business, Iraq,  and Switzerland. Aintabli (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've just placed the article under indefinite ECP under WP:GS/Crypto due to what looks very like extensive commercial sockpuppetry - David Gerard (talk) 13:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I did a lot of work on this article in August to clean it up, but it dropped from my Watchlist so I missed the edits over the last few months. The indefinite protection might help. I'd be happy to revert to my previous version which I feel is more balanced, and I did a lot of work getting it to that stage. But also happy to Delete.  Qcne  (talk)  08:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep was likely PROMO, but source 12 is solid, in a RS., further coverage for opening a "crypto school" that was shut down by the regulators. These don't appear to be "allegations", but fraudulent activities. Doesn't perhaps pass criminal notability, but should be enough for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 17:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * also coverage in French and . He's being investigated for money laundering  and  Oaktree b (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.