Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daedric Princes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 09:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Daedric Princes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable independent sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Elder Scrolls games. As Wikipedia is not a gameguide, and this is all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete this is all "in universe" meaning that there is no content what-so-ever which might be of any use or interest, or encyclopedic value to someone in *this* universe. The Elder Scrolls wiki has a total of 9,663 articles, it seems that a large proportion of them are also over here.  Those few that have encyclopedic content, meeting WP:N using WP:RS and are written with reference to meaning in this universe, ought to be kept.  The others (such as this one) that are simply game cruft ought to be over there where WP:N does not apply. Pete.Hurd (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN fails WP:FICT. RMHED (talk) 00:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Article should be integrated into the one of the main Elder Scrolls game articles. Peter1968 (talk) 04:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Peter, then you should say merge, not delete. DGG (talk) 02:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Corrected Peter1968 07:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. No out-of-universe perspective, no real-world notability. Does not meet the requirements of Notability (fiction).  Pagra shtak  16:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.