Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daffodil Institute of Information Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 08:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Daffodil Institute of Information Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet WP:ORG. I can find no independent sources that give any significant coverage of the subject. The only reference present is to the organizations own website and the only sources I have been able to find online are self-published, Facebook, various directory listings and Linkedin. The best I could come up with is which is an accreditation partner of the subject and therefore not independent. Pol430  talk to me  20:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails notability requirements. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - degree-awarding institution that awards UK accredited degrees. We keep degree-awarding institutions for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Bangladeshi institutions because, unlike US schools for example, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this college cannot meet notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 03:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: per TerriersFan - Ret.Prof (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with TerriersFan that degree-awarding institutions of higher learning can be considered to be notable unless the article is a hoax. Lack of readily available English language sources doesn't make the case for deletion, because there are highly likely to be published sources in Bengali.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  00:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.