Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daffodil International Professional Training Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Daffodil International Professional Training Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This organization is not notable, AFAICT.
 * The article was created and edited by a single-purpose user (User:Wikiwebsbd) today. The only other contributions of this user have been to related articles and their talk pages (Md Sabur Khan and Daffodil International University).
 * Cited sources (from this revision) are either from websites owned by the subject, generic directory sites, or a single Bangladeshi online news site of unknown reputability (and we can't evaluate it because it's in Bengali). No coverage from any known RS.

Mr. Khan may be regarded as quite successful locally, but I don't believe it rises to the level of notability for en Wikipedia, certainly not as cited. The related articles seem to be similar. —&#91;  Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 01:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable, no real attempt to show notability in the article, references are the phone book (?!) and internal stuff. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete All I'm seeing is self-generated content. Seems to fail WP:CORP. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree subject appears to lack coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources, and therefore does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Pol430   talk to me  11:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - spectacularly non-notable, fails WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable -- No unique  names  17:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.