Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daffy Rents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep as no one other then the nominator recommends it for deletion. &mdash; Maggot Syn 23:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Daffy Rents

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete nn cartoon Mayalld (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd describe any Looney Tunes episode as notable: they're pretty much the gold standard of animated cartooning. The problem here is that the original article creator doesn't know how to turn off his cap lock key, and he cuts-and-pastes copyvios as articles.  I've deleted the obvious copyvios and Dlohcierekim has been fixing up the others.  I'd have no objection to the re-creation of the other episodes in an appropriate form, either.   Acroterion  (talk)  11:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there is sufficient media coverage here. The links I added help establish that. Any Daffy Duck cartoon is sufficiently notable for coverage here. At worst, it should be merged and redirected to List of Daffy Duck cartoons. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  14:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Acroterion puts it quite well.  Dloh  cierekim  14:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Wait, there is a constant struggle on WP concerning issues of television episode notability, yet a six minute Daffy Duck short is inherently notable? He's probably my favorite cartoon character, but I'm not sure I can agree with that.  Sure, sources are going to mention it, but is there actual content that can make up a real article out there? I'd lean towards a merge, but I don't have enough conviction in any direction to voice it as a vote yet. -Verdatum (talk) 15:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Daffy passed WP:N. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep all theatrical Warner Brothers cartoons. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as no valid rationale has been given for deletion. JuJube (talk) 02:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment the rationale is that Whilst the series of cartoons is notable, individual cartoons are not. Mayalld (talk) 06:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, sounds like a reason to merge rather than delete. Granted, collective notability is stronger than individual notability. If we leave out the plot summaries, would fill out List of Daffy Duck cartoons nicely. If we add plot summaries, it would be too unwieldy in the List. It's not the size of your article or the length of your subject that counts. Ya go with what ya got. Cheers,   Dloh  cierekim  13:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.