Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daft Punk Expansion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 02:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Daft Punk Expansion
Translation of an article from a student magazine about rumours surrounding Daft Punk. WP is not a crystal ball. Article misnamed. Could easily be one sentence in the main article. Possible copyvio, too. Delete kingboyk 01:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC) I think there's good reason to imagine it is a copyright violation, but if that's going to be focussed on rather than the merits or otherwise of the article it would be prudent of me to strike out that 'charge'. --kingboyk 03:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Could you please name the website it is a copyvio of? -- M @  th  wiz  2020  02:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Possible copyvio, and not everything comes from the web. It's a direct translation of a magazine article ("Translated from Le Résumé Bat Student times"), which one might reasonably assume is subject to copyright! However, that's not the key point on which I am proposing it for deletion and I'm happy to strike out that point if it's going to complicate things. The point is, it's entirely speculative and at best is a merge without redirect, not being on a topic important enough for a seperate article, imho. --kingboyk 03:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. If Daft Punk adds new members and we have reliable verifiable sources to confirm this, it should be covered in the Daft Punk article. This however is based on rumours reported in a student newspaper which does not meet the standards in Cite sources. Capitalistroadster 03:36, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: article claims: Translated from Le Résumé Bat Student times. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 04:01 2006-01-29
 * Merge to Daft Punk or delete -- Astrokey44 |talk 14:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified. If verified, merge to Daft Punk. Peyna 15:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, needs verification. If the information is verified, merge to Daft Punk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terenceong1992 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.