Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagdusheth Halwai Ganpati of pune


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Per WP:HEY (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Dagdusheth Halwai Ganpati of pune

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Repeat of page Ganesha replete with WP:MOS problems (page creator SIGNED article) and no sources. ← Spidern  →  05:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ganesha as a somewhat less than likely search term but still useful.- Mgm|(talk) 09:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Though a cleanup is needed, the article should not be deleted. The article' subject is a famous Ganesha idol in Pune. -- Redtigerxyz  Talk 14:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. WP:MOS violations are reasons for editing, not deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is the most popular Ganesha temple and image in Pune. I've rewritten the article, and added references. The name of the article needs fixing. 'P' in Pune should be capitalized, and perhaps the article title should be "Dagdusheth Halwai Temple, Pune", rather than the name of the image, or maybe not. Someone from Maharashtra should know the answer. ~ priyanath talk 03:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have completely reworked this article. Moved categories to right place, added more information on trust and its work, improved prose, used MoS style, added reliable sources and moved the page to Dagadusheth Halwai Ganapati temple. The naming convention now is similar to another famous Ganesh temple Siddhivinayak temple of Mumbai. Those asking for merge or delete please review again. I do not think violation of WP:MOS says article should go up on AfD. -- GP Pande  talk!  11:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. GPPanda has made notability clear. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per GP Pande . Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.