Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daggerspine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Daggerspine
Insignificant gaming cruft. Individual game servers are not notable and the current contents are mostly junk written by vandalous anons. jni 06:34, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

I don't know if that's necessarily the policy of wikipedia as I'm not well-versed but if action is taken to stem the vandalism then I don't see why it can't stick around. I have edited out the crap and left only useful information, but it's entirely possible the vandalism may be too persistent in which case I support deletion. GTMusashi 3.42 AM, 11 November 2005
 * Vandalism alone should not be considered a reason for deletion, even when it is persistent. Your improvements are well and good but I still question whether the topic itself deserves to be included to Wikipedia. jni 08:57, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Smerge into World of Warcraft; we definitely don't need a list of all clans on the server, nor half this article. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 10:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Send the 1st two sections to World of Warcraft if they want it, DELETE everything else. Wahming 10:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Let it stay. This article was just recently noticed by the Daggerspine community, so certain misfits will try to tamper with it for attention. In a few days, however, they'll get bored and move on and the article can remain intact. Just wait it out and the entry will achieve normality. 63.101.88.100 12:45, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Chase


 * It's not the vandalism at issue. It's whether this article should be here.


 * Delete. Individual game servers are not notable.  The risk of vandalism is not a valid reason for delaying deletion.  Vandals would grow bolder if they thought they influenced our decisions. Durova 13:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete individual game servers are not notable, and none of the information is the least bit encyclopedic whatsoever... lists of players and guilds, complete with external links?! What the hell? Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  14:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This kind of information really does not belong in a general-purpose encyclopedia; it belongs on one of the game websites. I can’t imagine why those who are interested in the details of the game would come to the Wikipedia to read up on it. They are much more likely to go to one of the game servers or game websites, where they could surely find much more complete and up-to-date information. &spades;DanMS 16:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete WoW gamecruft.--Isotope23 21:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete trivial gamecruft. MCB 22:53, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial Carina22 15:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamecruft. *drew 03:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.