Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagmar Frinta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Dagmar Frinta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created in 2011 as a long standing article request, but I can't see much basis for a Wikipedia article about this Manhattan based illustrator. True, she had a six-page feature in a prominent Swiss magazine in 1985, but judging by her own biography on her website, she hasn't received any other coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Sionk (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unfortunately, no WP:RS that supports any of the claims. Agricola44 (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * She doesn't seem notable at all in the way I am accustomed to discovering in art pages. I also can't find anything about the claims for Syracuse U or Parsons, though they are probably legit. This short article could probably be better turned into a stub for her father, the Czech writer and art restorer Mojmir S. Frinta, with a sub paragraph on her. Jane (talk) 08:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.