Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagmar Lahlum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Dagmar Lahlum

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Obscure Norwegian woman, whose only claim to fame is that she was briefly one of several mistresses of famed British spy Eddie Chapman. While her story is interesting, she has no notability apart from Chapman's, so this article really should be either deleted or merged with Eddie Chapman, which has a section on his love life where this belongs. ScottyBerg (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree with the above that this article should be deleted or merged with Eddie Chapman.--Tzadkiel43 (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - a resistance and MI5 agent - and participant in the Eddie Chapman story.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 10:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * There's no question that she helped out Chapman, but I'm not seeing any notable achievements apart from that. Relationships do not confer notability. ScottyBerg (talk) 15:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * <>  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 09:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep this article in Norway's largest newspaper published eight years post mortem clearly demonstrates her notability. Arsenikk (talk)  10:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  —Mentoz86 (talk) 03:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Arsenikk - passes WP:GNG. (And if the nominator is currently blocked indefinitely for a sock puppet, I don't see the point of this discussion) Mentoz86 (talk) 03:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Struck comments made by ScottyBerg, a sockpupet of a indefinitely banned user. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.