Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagra cryptocurrency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject has not met the general notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 00:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Dagra cryptocurrency

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable cryptocurrency sourced entirely to press releases and primary sources with no coverage available and relatively unknown in the crypto world. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  20:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  20:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  20:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete WP:G11, as per nom. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 21:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as patent nonsense, category two: "Content that, while apparently intended to mean something, is so confusing that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it." —Codename Lisa (talk) 06:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I can understand it, even though the English isn't quite up to par. L3X1 (distænt write)  14:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, . It is good to hear that. Perhaps you wouldn't mind explaining the one sentence that irritates me the most? "All transactions are immediate and guaranteed because the gateways are blocked by a present transaction." —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, you had to ask about that one :) I assume it refers to network blocks/blockchains, though that pushes on the bounds of grammar. L3X1 (distænt write)  15:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, there are other stuff too. For example, the very next sentence: "Coin mining is possible by ordinary computers and video cards." I desparately gazed at this sentence, trying to decide whether to remove it as vandalism or not. Fortunately, I read later and realized that "mining" is just a misnomer and doesn't have anything in common with, say, mining gold or silver. Later,  told me that miners actually do earn something. Armed with all this knowledge, "video card" still trips me. I believe this article is an advertisement written for someone who is totally familiar with the subject of cryptocurrency and Bitcoin. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as it doesn't seem to be widely used or notable for any other reason. If it was widely used there would be at least some discussions about it online. Compared to other crypto-currencies, this one seems to be largely unknown.--DreamLinker (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is outright non notable. No secondary coverage; no evidence of reliable sources report. Primary sources show existence but existence is not notability –Ammarpad (talk) 14:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This is CSD A7 stuff. &mdash;cnzx (talk) 04:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.