Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dahlia Kurtz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Dahlia Kurtz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a single-market radio personality and newspaper columnist, not referenced to any reliable source coverage about her: four of the five references here are her primary source profiles on the websites of her own employers and GoodReads, and the fifth is a blog post which verifies the existence of an anthology that she contributed to but fails to even mention her name at all in conjunction with it. None of this represents reliable source coverage about her for the purposes of clearing a Wikipedia notability criterion, and the article claims nothing that would entitle her to a presumption of notability in the absence of reliable source coverage about her. Bearcat (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete This is a case of TOOSOON. I'm finding mentions of her on HighBeam, but not any hits in other databases. Delete without prejudice for recreation when more notable sources are found. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously a declined PROD, cannot be closed using the WP:NOQUORUM rationale.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Malinaccier ( talk ) 18:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG upcoming not notable at this point.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.