Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dahlia Wasfi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Dahlia Wasfi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This peace activist has a few mentions in smaller newspapers and spoke to a Congressional forum, which to me seems to be rather light on notability. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep I atleast see the minimum requirements for inclusion.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * which requirements? LibStar (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * note to closing admin according to this user's log, this is the part of 5 keep !votes undertaken in 5 minutes. LibStar (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And how do you know that I didnt read trough them all before? and then proceeded to write them down in this period only. Assume good faith.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * turning up and voting with minimal explanation like "meets minimum requirements" or "as per reasons above" doesn't seem you even read the AfD and article. LibStar (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I find news coverage about her in several Reliable Sources including the Denver Post, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Arizona Republic. --MelanieN (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The sources I see are background to quotations or passing coverage. Does not indicate, to me, the "significant coverage" necessary to create a meaningful, verifiable biography.--Danger (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.