Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daigaku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Daigaku

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This page violates WP:MOSDAB, namely regarding including definitions and WP:DABNOT regarding partial title matches. The term "daigaku" is not ambiguous (it has one meaning in Japanese and none in English) and so this page is unnecessary. armagebedar (talk) 08:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as unneccessary list - we don't need an article/list for every foreign term. completely fails WP:NOT.  Blodance  the   Seeker   12:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per the above reasons. Though it could, perhaps, be redirected to it's translation in English. According to WP:ENGLISH, "Redirects from non-English names are encouraged". Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  17:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- partial title match list. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -armagebedar (talk) 00:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete we don't use foreign generics as dab page placeholders for all specific articles that may fit under them, since I doubt very much whether any of these is called "Daigaku" alone anywhere. Cf. Universidad for a proper usage. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to university. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to University. --DAJF (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.