Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daighila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Daighila

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Based on a before search, not finding anything that indicates this band is notable. Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Malaysia. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: [1 ] and [2 ] seem to be SIRS, but I'm not certain those push this over the boundary. C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 05:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think these are all that "significant". I didn't come up with anything better, either. I assume there's a language barrier in the way of searching but I've tried and failed to get around that. Their website and blog don't link to useful non-english coverage either. -- asilvering (talk) 20:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Very Weak Keep. WP:NBAND needs multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself and WP:GNG needs significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.
 * I know we tend to like three sources, but that's not a rule. I think:
 * https://www.nme.com/en_asia/news/music/malaysian-screamo-act-daighila-return-with-two-new-singles-announce-new-album-3162603; in NME and
 * https://uniteasia.org/se-asia-rule-bands-like-daighila-2-new-tracks-now-malaysia/ in the notable publication Unite Asia
 * Technically passes the criteria. Weakly. It's not great. It's probably less than what I see others tending to want, but our job is to share our interpretation of the guidelines and my interpretation is that in the weakest possible sense, the criteria is met. CT55555 (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. I have reviewed the sources and, in my view, two sources of the quality cited by are insufficient to confer notability. The sources fall on the edge of triviality, and the small number makes the case for notability weaker. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 02:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.