Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Sham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Daily Sham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local newspaper with no notability found. Fails WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  07:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is an unsourced article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep per the utter lack of any evidence of WP:BEFORE having been done to back up the rationale for deletion. – Uanfala —Preceding undated comment added 00:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * But why? burden is on the user who created this WP:PERMASTUB. Störm   (talk)  13:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I can’t find any significance coverage about this newspaper with which to write an article or to show it meets WP:GNG. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.